Forums
.thumb.jpg.b21ca1d0c15fb56b42c39b25a0a40815.jpg)
-
Who's Online 2 Members, 1 Anonymous, 56 Guests (See full list)
-
Latest updates
-
-
Newest Posts
-
.thumb.png.0d87fc71cb8a644c5d862ceabac1e0d5.png)
By Lion.Kanzen · Posted
The shine of the metal and the sounds are impressive. -
-
By Lion.Kanzen · Posted
This game caught my attention. At first it seemed limited, but the expansions have made it stand out. -
By Lion.Kanzen · Posted
I had already mentioned it, but today I tried it, what a great. It's like Stronghold tends to be half city builder. I thought it was simpleton. Aside from the farm system, many neutral buildings can be captured: Temples Orchards Minor settlements -
By Lion.Kanzen · Posted
I made a building for that matter. It is a kind of cistern. I already forgot the name hahaha. I proposed this mechanics many times and they thought I was crazy. I suggested it to Wow and he either didn't understand or wasn't interested. Cisterns don't need rivers, it's supposed to be like a well. You collect water inside the soil... underground. It's like building a well and immediately you have enough to survive. People in deserts and mountains create wells for irrigation. In 0AD you would already have the bonus by having that building. -
By Grautvornix · Posted
The point is just that currrently we have "fertile land" (looking like empty fields providing a certain bonus - definitely in DE but also in vanilla) and "general land" (whatever the structure/cover - even paved land, rocky areas and desert areas can host crops. The latter is really a pity: we have such beautiful maps with fertile land (e.g. green areas forming an oasis) and not so much fertile land surrounding it (mostly sandy desert). Currently, it just does not really seem to matter where I put my fields. Also the strategic placement of fields around CC (on paved areas) - while strategically a valid option - looks not very realistic to me, as discussed previously. Potential options are: - distance to CC bonus for fields (increasing with growing distance) or a negative aura of a CC on crops yield. - use water as an additional resource as proposed earlier. This appears too complicated to achieve and would change the game mechanic considerably (building a whole bonus system around rivers, ponds, irrigation pipes/wells/aquaeducts, etc.). - fertility derived from soil type / soil cover could thus create some interesting strategic aspect for gameplay without costing too much effort (I hope) To be further discussed, I believe... -
By Lion.Kanzen · Posted
We could try to put 0 AD in some not very well known indie store. Like https://itch.io/ itch.io is a simple way to find and share indie games online for free. There are a lot of niche games out there and a lot of fan games. About itch.io itch.io is an open marketplace for independent digital creators with a focus on independent video games. It’s a platform that enables anyone to sell the content they've created. As a seller you’re in charge of how it’s done: you set the price, you run sales, and you design your pages. It’s never necessary to get votes, likes, or follows to get your content approved, and you can make changes to how you distribute your work as frequently as you like. itch.io is also a collection of some of the most unique, interesting, and independent creations you'll find on the web. We're not your typical digital storefront, with a wide range of both paid and free content, we encourage you to look around and see what you find.
-
(1).thumb.gif.b5909d3df98a8ec15dc452423f219bc5.gif)
